Soccer scandals: Former officials’ confessions shed light on corruption



Former officials in the soccer sector expressed remorse for how their corruption caused disorders in the sector in an anti-graft special aired on Tuesday night.

In November 2022, Li Tie, the former head coach of the Chinese national men’s football team, was placed under investigation.

Subsequently, more than a dozen high-ranking and mid-level officials of the Chinese Football Association came under scrutiny, including Du Zhaocai, former deputy director of the General Administration of Sport of China and former Party secretary of the CFA, and Chen Xuyuan, former president of the CFA.

The disciplinary and supervisory authorities and the public security agencies investigated dozens of individuals, including coaches, players, referees, club executives, and agents.

“Certain activities that seemed commonplace within the soccer circle were, in fact, illegal and criminal,” said Li Tie.

Li’s appointment as the head coach of the national team was attributed to his success in leading two China League One teams to promotion to the Chinese Super League.

However, investigations revealed that behind both instances of promotion, there were substantial instances of match-fixing.

After retiring as a player, Li transitioned to coaching and joined Hebei China Fortune Football Club in August 2015, and the club requested him to use his connections to influence opponents.

“During my time as a player, I detested those who engaged in match-fixing the most. However, because I knew that these actions might help increase our team’s chances of promotion, when I became an independent head coach for the first time, I also had a special desire to prove myself with this mindset,” he said.

Having tasted success through match-fixing at Hebei China Fortune, Li continued to promote match-fixing when he became the head coach of Wuhan Zall Football Club in 2017.

“By gaining ‘success’ through such improper means, it actually makes me more and more impatient and eager for quick results. In order to achieve good performance, I resorted to influencing referees, bribing opposing players and coaches, sometimes through clubs dealing with other clubs. This behavior becomes a habit, and eventually, there is even a slight dependence on these practices,” he said.

Li expressed regret, emphasizing the need to be down-to-earth, take the right path, avoid hasty pursuits of success, and refrain from trying to cut corners.

One significant reason for the rampant growth of corruption in football was the failure of the CFA, which should have taken on a supervisory role.

Over the years, several officials within CFA were involved in corruption and used their authority to help clubs gain undue advantages. Chen Xuyuan pointed out that corruption in Chinese soccer was pervasive and not limited to a specific aspect.

Chen admitted to accepting money from clubs, stating that if he were to crack down on such practices, it would be beating himself; then he just let the disorder go unchecked. Chen recalled that the night before he was elected as the sixth president of the CFA in August 2019, two local soccer association officials visited him, each offering 300,000 yuan ($42,200) as a token of appreciation and seeking his favor.

“They came into my room, casually placed their backpack on my sofa, and said, Congratulations, President Chen. We hope you can take care of us more. When I asked what they were offering, they responded it is just a tradition and they all do it this way,” Chen said.

“While fans could tolerate the backwardness of Chinese soccer, they could not forgive corruption,” Chen said.

As the president of the Chinese Football Association, Chen admitted primary responsibility and extended a deep apology to soccer fans nationwide.

Du Zhaocai, former deputy director of the GASC and former Party chief of CFA, similarly abused his position for personal gain, accepting millions of yuan in gifts and money while turning a blind eye to the irregularities in soccer.

Du admitted to using money and gifts as a common way to facilitate various matters, suggesting that this practice had become somewhat routine. “I also failed to play the role of a ‘goalkeeper’ in the anti-corruption campaign in Chinese soccer. In the midst of the club owners’ pursuit of interests, which was actually a subjective reason, I didn’t exert strict control and, in some cases, went along with the corrupt,” Du said.

Wild panda mother, cub captured on cameras in Sichuan

function isIE() {
return navigator.appName.indexOf(“Microsoft Internet Explorer”) != -1;
}

function Rand() {
var date = new Date();
var Num = date.getFullYear() + “” + date.getMonth() + “” + date.getDate() + “0”;
return Num;
}

function getNextURL(url) {
window.location.href = url;
}

var isIEBR = isIE();
//alert(isIEBR);
//var videofile = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/605E035336BE4342B60DE9D603036CF2.mp4’;
var videofile = “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/605E035336BE4342B60DE9D603036CF2.mp4”;
//var video_pic = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/C4027E2E6A6644B08A5F5CAD283C9BEA.jpg’;
var video_pic = “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/C4027E2E6A6644B08A5F5CAD283C9BEA.jpg”;
// var video_pic = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/C4027E2E6A6644B08A5F5CAD283C9BEA.jpg’;
var testAppleMobile = /(iPhone|iPad|iPod)/i;
if (testAppleMobile.test(navigator.userAgent)) {
//如果没有匹配中苹果设备可以调用flash播放器支持
var b = document.getElementById(“dgqlayer”);
b.innerHTML = ““;
} else if(isIEVer(7) || isIEVer(8) || isIEVer(6)){ //低版本使用flash
var rand = Rand();
var so = new SWFObject(“//i2.chinanews.com/shipin/flv/video2010V1.0.1_common.swf?rand=” + rand, “myswf”, “600”, “337”, “6”, “#000000”, true);
so.addParam(“quality”, “high”);
so.addParam(“allowFullScreen”, “true”);
so.addParam(“allowScriptAccess”, “always”);
so.addVariable(“vInfo”, videofile);
so.addParam(“wmode”, “transparent”);
so.addVariable(“auto”, “1”);
so.addVariable(“tiaotime”, “10”);
so.addVariable(“vsimg”, “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2024/02/19/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/C4027E2E6A6644B08A5F5CAD283C9BEA.jpg”);
so.write(“dgqlayer”);
}else {
var b = document.getElementById(“dgqlayer”);
// b.innerHTML = ““;
b.innerHTML = ‘

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser thatsupports HTML5 video

‘;
}

function isIEVer(ieVer){
var b = document.createElement(‘b’);
b.innerHTML = ‘‘;
return b.getElementsByTagName(‘i’).length === 1;
}
// var myVid=document.getElementById(“my-video”);

var myPlayer = videojs(‘my-video’);
videojs(“my-video”).ready(function(){
var myPlayer = this;
myPlayer.play();
});


On Sunday, infrared cameras in a nature reserve in southwest China’s Sichuan Province captured footage of a wild giant panda mother and her cub hanging out together. 

The video clips showed an adult panda strolling in the woods. She was followed by a panda cub who stumbled into the cameras. The infrared cameras also captured images of snow leopards, antelopes, red pandas, and other wildlife foraging for food. 

(Reported by Liu Gang; Edited by Qi Yiling)

 

China’s Zheng Qinwen secures her first Grand Slam semifinal appearance



China’s top women’s ace Zheng Qinwen secured her career-first Grand Slam semifinal berth in Melbourne on Wednesday after beating Russia’s Anna Kalinskaya 2-1 in a quarterfinal clash at the Australian Open.

Currently ranked No 15 this week, Zheng overcame a first-set scare and regained her focus to outlast 75th-ranked Kalinskaya, 6-7(4), 6-3, 6-1, in two hours and 20 minutes at Rod Laver Arena to cruise into a major semifinal for the first time in her young career.

Zheng, who made her first Grand Slam quarterfinal at the U.S. Open last year, won 10 of the last 11 games of the match to become the third Chinese major semifinalist in history.

She follows in the footsteps of two-time Grand Slam champion Li Na, the winner in Melbourne just 10 years ago, retired star Zheng Jie, who reached the semis at 2008 Wimbledon as a qualifier, and Peng Shuai at the 2014 U.S. Open to become the fourth Chinese woman to make it to the major semifinals.

The result also guarantees that Zheng will make her top-10 debut on the WTA rankings next week after the Aussie Open, making her the second Chinese woman after Li to crack the top echelon. Last month, the 21-year-old was named Most Improved Player of the Year after winning her first two WTA Tour titles in Palermo in July and on home soil in Zhengzhou in October.

“Thanks for letting me know that, nobody told me anything about that,” Zheng said of her top-10 breakthrough during the post-match interview.

“It’s good news for me, another motivation, especially I said last year when I was at the Australian Open that I wanted to be in the top 10. One year later I realized the goal,” said Zheng, who lost in the second round at the 2023 AO.

Opening the match with an obvious big-time nerve, Zheng made a string of unforced errors in the first set, but hit her groove midway through the second, hitting 42 winners, including 10 aces, as she pulled away for victory in the decider.

“She played really well today. Really good baseline strokes. The match was really tough for me,” said Zheng, who will play Ukraine’s Dayana Yastremska on Thursday for a final berth at the season-opening major.

“I just try to stay focused, don’t think anything else. I am really excited for the first time for me to be in the semifinals, especially with such a good performance like this,” said Zheng.

Young giant panda Qing Ci dies from rare intestinal disorder


File image of giant panda Qing Ci. (Photo from the WeChat  China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda)

File image of giant panda Qing Ci. (Photo from the WeChat China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda)

(ECNS) — Giant panda Qing Ci died on March 23 due to a rare complication of intestinal intussusception, the China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Panda said on Wednesday.

Qing Ci, a female giant panda, was born at the center’s Hetaoping base in Wolong, southwest China’s Sichuan Province, on June 21, 2022.

The panda was diagnosed with an intestinal obstruction on March 2 this year. The center invited experts from West China Hospital and conducted surgery for it on March 5.

Qing Ci experienced a sudden intussusception during recovery, leading to a secondary obstruction.

Emergency surgery was performed on March 17, and the necrotic intestinal segment was successfully removed.

However, despite the care provided by the expert team around the clock, the panda failed to survive.

Intestinal intussusception in giant pandas is a dangerous abdominal emergency with a very short time for intervention.

Qing Ci was the first case of the disorder discovered at the China Conservation and Research Center for Giant Pandas in recent years.

Fans bid farewell to panda Le Le in Singapore

function isIE() {
return navigator.appName.indexOf(“Microsoft Internet Explorer”) != -1;
}

function Rand() {
var date = new Date();
var Num = date.getFullYear() + “” + date.getMonth() + “” + date.getDate() + “0”;
return Num;
}

function getNextURL(url) {
window.location.href = url;
}

var isIEBR = isIE();
//alert(isIEBR);
//var videofile = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/BB861B34D976475AB04F36408A8DCFA3.mp4’;
var videofile = “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/BB861B34D976475AB04F36408A8DCFA3.mp4”;
//var video_pic = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/B97B1620D82A421E9B7D3866EA91DE17.jpg’;
var video_pic = “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/B97B1620D82A421E9B7D3866EA91DE17.jpg”;
// var video_pic = ‘https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/B97B1620D82A421E9B7D3866EA91DE17.jpg’;
var testAppleMobile = /(iPhone|iPad|iPod)/i;
if (testAppleMobile.test(navigator.userAgent)) {
//如果没有匹配中苹果设备可以调用flash播放器支持
var b = document.getElementById(“dgqlayer”);
b.innerHTML = ““;
} else if(isIEVer(7) || isIEVer(8) || isIEVer(6)){ //低版本使用flash
var rand = Rand();
var so = new SWFObject(“//i2.chinanews.com/shipin/flv/video2010V1.0.1_common.swf?rand=” + rand, “myswf”, “600”, “337”, “6”, “#000000”, true);
so.addParam(“quality”, “high”);
so.addParam(“allowFullScreen”, “true”);
so.addParam(“allowScriptAccess”, “always”);
so.addVariable(“vInfo”, videofile);
so.addParam(“wmode”, “transparent”);
so.addVariable(“auto”, “1”);
so.addVariable(“tiaotime”, “10”);
so.addVariable(“vsimg”, “https://poss-videocloud.cns.com.cn/oss/2023/12/14/chinanews/MEIZI_YUNSHI/onair/B97B1620D82A421E9B7D3866EA91DE17.jpg”);
so.write(“dgqlayer”);
}else {
var b = document.getElementById(“dgqlayer”);
// b.innerHTML = ““;
b.innerHTML = ‘

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser thatsupports HTML5 video

‘;
}

function isIEVer(ieVer){
var b = document.createElement(‘b’);
b.innerHTML = ‘‘;
return b.getElementsByTagName(‘i’).length === 1;
}
// var myVid=document.getElementById(“my-video”);

var myPlayer = videojs(‘my-video’);
videojs(“my-video”).ready(function(){
var myPlayer = this;
myPlayer.play();
});


Le Le, a Singapore-born giant panda, made his final public appearance at River Wonders Park in Singapore on Wednesday.  

About 1,000 guests and panda lovers came to the Pavilion Capital Giant Panda Forest exhibit of River Wonders Park to bid farewell to the giant panda Le Le.  

After the farewell party, Le Le, the two-year-old giant panda cub and the first panda born in Singapore, entered the month-long quarantine and prepared for his flight to China on January 16, 2024.   Le Le was born to giant pandas Jia Jia and Kai Kai. The parents arrived in Singapore in 2012 and will remain at River Wonders and focus on planning for their future breeding cycles.  

(Reporter   He Xi    Editor  Wang Xiaoting)  

Chinese FM again urges U.S. to stop suppressing Chinese students



Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson on Monday slammed the U.S. for creating obstacles for cultural and people-to-people exchanges between China and the U.S. over reports revealing Chinese students and scholars being arbitrarily revoked visas and forcibly deported without concrete evidence.

The U.S. keeps overstretching the concept of national security, arbitrarily revoking visas, restricting entry, and forcibly deporting Chinese students without concrete evidence, causing great harm to the individuals involved and creating obstacles for cultural and people-to-people exchanges between China and the U.S., Mao Ning, a spokesperson for the ministry said at Monday’s regular press briefing. 

At U.S. airports, especially Washington Dulles International Airport, cases of Chinese students being deported have begun to rise again, according to media reports. 

In March, the Washington Post interviewed six Chinese students and two visiting scholars who had been questioned upon landing the U.S.. Visas for a pair were cancelled and they were immediately deported. 

Previously in January, Chinese Ambassador to the U.S. Xie Feng had revealed that dozens of Chinese arriving in the U.S., including students, were being denied entry every month over the past few months. They held valid visas, had no criminal records, and were returning to school after travelling elsewhere or reuniting with their family in China. But when they landed at the airport, what awaited them was 8-hour-long interrogation by officers, who prohibited them from contacting their parents, made groundless accusations against them, and even forcibly deported them and banned their entry. 

Mao said that recent cases have shown that U.S. law enforcement officials are deporting individuals solely for the purpose of deporting, demonstrating typical political discrimination and selective law enforcement.

Mao urged the U.S. to immediately cease unwarranted harassment and deportation of Chinese citizens, stop suppressing and persecuting Chinese students. 

The U.S. should take practical actions to fulfill its commitments to support and facilitate cultural and people-to-people exchanges between China and the U.S., rather than saying one thing and doing another, Mao said. 

The spokesperson also stressed that China will take resolute measures to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens.

Fans bid farewell to only giant pandas in the UK




Yang Guang (left) and Tian Tian eat bamboo at Edinburgh Zoo in Scotland. They are set to return to China in early December. (The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland)

With the only giant pandas, Yang Guang and Tian Tian, in the United Kingdom set to return to China in early December after a 12-year stay at Scotland’s Edinburgh Zoo, crowds have been thronging the panda enclosure to bid them farewell.

The Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, the conservation charity that owns and manages Edinburgh Zoo, said on Nov 17 that the pandas will leave for China in the first week of December, but the exact date and time of departure won’t be announced due to safety and security reasons.

Yang Guang, whose name means sunshine, and Tian Tian, whose name translates to sweetie, arrived at the Edinburgh Zoo in December 2011 as part of a 10-year agreement between the zoological society in Scotland and the China Wildlife Conservation Association. The agreement was later extended by two years because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Since their arrival, Yang Guang and Tian Tian have garnered a great deal of public interest, and the BBC billed the panda enclosure as a “rock star” attraction that has been at the top of the must-see list of more than 600,000 visitors to the zoo each year.

Vanessa Moreland-Strange and Andrew Strange, a couple living near Edinburgh, brought their two children to the zoo recently to say goodbye to the pandas. The family told China Daily they had visited the panda enclosure 28 times since 2018 and “every time was the best time”.

“It is just a good family time,” said Strange. “You come and watch them playing. Sometimes they are quiet, sometimes mischievous and playful, sometimes a bit grumpy, like our two little children. It is good that we can come and learn while having a nice day out and also contribute toward the conservation of the environment.”

Moreland-Strange said the pandas had influenced her daughter’s ambition to work as an animal conservationist when she grows up.

“My daughter is very passionate about endangered species and feels very strongly about how we have treated our world. She wants to try and fix conservation problems as a career. Pandas have helped her to grow her passion. So, it just seems like the pandas fell into place with us all,” she said.

Lisa Taylor, who flew in from Bristol in Southwest England to say goodbye to the pair, said it was a privilege to have pandas in the UK.

“They are very special animals. We are very privileged to see them here in the UK because they are very rare. There are so many people who never, ever get to see a panda,” she said.

To bid farewell to Yang Guang and Tian Tian, the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland has been holding a series of events since January that have proved immensely popular.

Activities priced between £30 and £500 ($38 and $630) included a one-hour guided tour and behind-the-scenes experience to help the keepers feed Yang Guang. The experience was offered exclusively to zoological society members as well as patrons and giant panda “adopters”. The tickets sold out in just 90 minutes.

The zoological society members said the sales raised more than £42,000, and the money will be used by the charity to help save wildlife from extinction.

“With more than a million species at risk of extinction and our natural world in crisis, Yang Guang and Tian Tian have had an incredible impact by inspiring millions of people to care about nature,” said David Field, the zoological society’s chief executive. “We have also made a significant contribution to our understanding of giant pandas, which will be of real benefit to efforts to protect this amazing species in China.”

Experts from China and Scotland have carried out multiple research projects, organized technical and personnel exchanges, and supported public education campaigns, such as the “Beyond the Panda” program, which offers a wealth of resources to students in Scotland so they can explore China’s animals, environment, geography and habitat, alongside its language.

“It is encouraging that in recent years, the outlook for giant pandas in the wild has improved, which gives us real hope for the future,” Field said.

Troop withdrawal from Gaza reflects severe challenges, complex dilemmas Israel is facing

People walk past damaged and destroyed buildings in Khan Younis on April 7, 2024, after Israel pulled its ground forces out of the southern Gaza Strip. Israel pulled all its troops out of southern Gaza on April 7, including from the city of Khan Younis, according to the Israeli military and media reports.Photo: VCG

People walk past damaged and destroyed buildings in Khan Younis on April 7, 2024, after Israel pulled its ground forces out of the southern Gaza Strip. Israel pulled all its troops out of southern Gaza on April 7, including from the city of Khan Younis, according to the Israeli military and media reports.Photo: VCG

The reported withdrawal of Israeli troops from southern Gaza could reflect that Israel is facing severe challenges and a complex dilemma under immense internal and external pressures, especially with the mounting risks of conflict with Iran following the military’s deadly attack on Iranian embassy compound in Syria, according to Chinese observers on Monday.

Israeli troops were withdrawn from southern Gaza in preparation for a possible operation in the city of Rafah, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant confirmed on Sunday, Xinhua News Agency reported. 

Israel withdrew all ground troops from southern Gaza except for the Nahal Brigade, which remains in central Gaza, splitting the Strip in two and preventing the return of civilians from south to north of Gaza, Xinhua reported. An Israeli brigade is typically made of a few thousand soldiers.

The sudden withdrawal action is widely believed to be in response to potential retaliation from Iran following the deadly attack on its embassy compound in Syria by the Israeli military on the April 1. This round of Israeli-Palestinian conflict, already lasting more than six months, has not only plunged the Gaza Strip into a severe humanitarian crisis, but also severely impacted the Israeli economy, leading to a sharp deterioration in the business environment and a surge in government spending, observers pointed out. 

Despite the Israeli military stating that the withdrawal aims to prepare for following missions, the timing and context of Israel’s withdrawal are evidently delicate and complex, Liu Zhongmin, a professor at the Middle East Studies Institute of Shanghai International Studies University, told the Global Times on Monday.

Recent major events surrounding the conflict and its spillover include the UN Security Council’s adoption of a cease-fire resolution for Gaza, large-scale protests in Israel with tens of thousands of participants, Israel’s attack of the Iranian embassy compound escalating the risk of conflict, Israeli forces killing several international aid workers, and the escalation of conflicts between Hezbollah and Israel in Lebanon, Liu said. “Therefore, Israel’s withdrawal in this context reflects the severe challenges and complex dilemma it faces under immense internal and external pressures. Even though the possibility of Israel launching military operations in southern Gaza in the future cannot be ruled out, its deepening predicament is hard to conceal.”

Israel’s withdrawal from southern Gaza coinciding with preparations to confront Iran is not coincidental. The withdrawal was originally a gradual process but has now accelerated, likely due to the worsening regional situation over recent days. This large-scale withdrawal is mainly in response to possible retaliatory actions from Iran, a military expert, who requested not to be named, told the Global Times on Monday. 

Israel’s bombing of the Iranian embassy failed to achieve the desired goal of restraining the US, exacerbating US-Iran tensions, and intensifying US-Iran confrontation. Although the US fundamentally won’t change its support for Israel and the alliance relationship between the two, Israel’s recent actions have clearly disrupted the international strategy, Middle East policy, and domestic elections of the Biden administration. The abstention vote cast by the US at the UN Security Council, to balance various needs, is to some extent a turning point in US policy adjustment in the new round of Israeli-Palestinian conflict and one of the important reasons for Israel’s decision to withdraw troops to de-escalate the conflict, he said. 

The White House, commenting on the partial withdrawal, said it was likely to be an opportunity for troops to “rest and refit”.

“They’ve been on the ground for four months, the word we’re getting is they’re tired, they need to be refit,” White House’s National Security Spokesman John Kirby said.

The Sunday withdrawal of troops from Southern Gaza also took place following what media called the worst week since the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023 for Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Protests against the longtime Israeli leader by the families of hostages and the opposition returned with a vengeance across the country as he spent two nights in hospital for hernia surgery. Then his major political rival, Benny Gantz, undermined the unity of the wartime government by calling for early elections; Netanyahu’s ultra-Orthodox coalition allies are already angry with him over a row regarding military conscription, the Guardian reported on Sunday.

Israel’s political, economic, social, diplomatic crises continue to deepen. The unprecedented wave of protests by Israeli opposition parties and the public against the Netanyahu government has reached a recent peak, with protests erupting in major cities like Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, demanding the resignation of the Netanyahu government, holding elections, and quickly reaching agreements to rescue hostages, with even riots breaking out. If allowed to develop, not only will Israel’s objectives in Gaza become increasingly distant, but the possibility of triggering a “Jerusalem Spring” due to the Gaza conflict cannot be ruled out, analysts said.

The severe economic contraction, profound social division, deep security crisis, souring international image, and deepening international isolation have put Israel on the verge of public anger eruption at any moment, they warned.

At the same time, Biden has also reportedly issued a stark warning to the Israeli leader on Thursday via phone call that the future US support for Israel’s Gaza war depends on the swift implementation of new steps to protect civilians and aid workers, the CNN reported.

Biden’s message marks a sharp change in his administration’s steadfast support for Israel’s war efforts, with the US leader for the first time threatening to rethink his backing if Israel doesn’t change its tactics and allow much more humanitarian aid into Gaza, per the report.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday blamed Hamas for the impasse in negotiations, saying the group’s demands were extreme because they would end the war permanently and leave Hamas intact, the WSJ reported. 

He said that despite heavy international pressure on Israel to agree to a cease-fire, Israel would only do so if the hostages are released. 

“Israel is ready for a deal, Israel is not ready for surrender,” Netanyahu said. Hamas, in turn, has accused Israel of not compromising for a deal.

Key facts clearer by comparing China-Europe, US-Europe interactions: Global Times editorial

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

Illustration: Liu Rui/GT

High-level interactions between China and Europe have been relatively frequent recently. Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao is on his Europe tour, visiting France now and Italy on April 12. A few days later, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz will travel to China with a large business delegation. 

Meanwhile, it has also been noticed that there are quite a few interactions between the US and Europe lately. The US-EU ministerial meeting of the Trade and Technology Council just concluded, and a US government official, who’s responsible for implementing export controls, is reportedly visiting the Netherlands on Monday local time. Although China’s development of relations with Europe has always had its own pace, some foreign media outlets will always create the narrative that both China and the US are “courting” Europe.

Comparing the interactions between China and Europe with those between the US and Europe may not necessarily be a bad thing. On the contrary, it helps us see some key facts more clearly. 

According to the European edition of US magazine Politico, during the recent ministerial meeting of the Trade and Technology Council, Washington was pushing to “put China in the text every two sentences,” said one European diplomat who spoke anonymously. “It kept hammering on the Chinese nail.” At the same time European capitals pushed to tone down the language against a country with which they’re eager to keep business ties. Although China was only mentioned three times in the final joint statement, it was clear that this process left Europe feeling uncomfortable.

As for the US export policy official visiting the Netherlands, it was not for friendly discussions as Western media used the term “pressure.” For the Dutch government, whether to comply with US demands to stop providing after-sales services of certain products to Chinese customers is a “diplomatic and commercial dilemma.” If this is considered the US “courting” Europe, then it is clearly a position of superiority. The US is causing pain to Europe, equivalent to cutting flesh in terms of interests, which is also humiliating in terms of diplomacy. The US may be aware that its actions could create rifts in its ties with Europe, but it continues to go on its own way, and the reasons behind this are even more intriguing.

China, of course, also values its relationship with Europe, but the goal is to expand cooperation between China and Europe, which is not targeted at any third party. At the same time, efforts are being made to address differences between the two sides with dialogue and communication. China has never demanded that Europe “put US in the text every two sentences.”

Between China and Europe, there is a relationship of mutual respect and equality. China will not allow Europe to feel “being caught in the middle.” Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s recent visit to China was very pleasant. He visited the Dashilan in Beijing and stated that “decoupling” is not an option for the Dutch government. Some details have been deliberately ignored by certain American media outlets in their reporting, but Europe is aware of them.

Just a couple of days ago, US Trade Representative Katherine Tai reminded Europe in Brussels, proclaiming the need to jointly address the “challenges” posed by China’s economic model to the US and Europe economic system. This is a typical rhetoric from Washington, hypocritically referring to Europe as its ally while shaping China as their common adversary, ultimately aiming to make Europe a stepping stone in its strategy toward China. Has Washington ever truly treated Europe as its ally? Previously, there was the trade war initiated by the Donald Trump administration against Europe, and now there’s the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act. Has Europe not suffered enough from the US?

As for the interaction between China and Europe, there is competition, however, cooperation far outweighs competition; there are differences between them, but consensus is far more common than differences. China has great patience in properly handling its differences with Europe and always seeks to enhance understanding through constructive dialogue. Despite the EU’s unreasonable initiation of an anti-subsidy investigation into Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), China still actively communicates with Europe and promotes the resolution of some specific issues with a proactive attitude, which itself represents goodwill and a responsible attitude. There are no fundamental conflicts of interest or geopolitical strategic contradictions between China and Europe. The correct positioning of China-Europe relations should be that of partners. It is the US that has been pushing Europe toward becoming a strategic competitor with China, as it is least interested in Europe having strategic autonomy.

Some people in the US and Europe always say that China is trying to “divide” the US and Europe, which is ridiculous. If the “de-risking” pursued by the US and Europe targets the part of China-Europe cooperation and mutual benefit, then China certainly has reason to oppose it. Some in Europe suggest whether this can be an opportunity to compel China to “make concessions” in China-Europe relations. This view is also shortsighted, as it underestimates the scope of China-Europe cooperation. There is vast potential for China-Europe cooperation, and we hope that the European side will meet China halfway, quickly overcoming the obstacles in China-Europe relations. This is not only about the interests of China and Europe but also concerns world peace, stability and prosperity.

US-led NATO brings disastrous ‘wars of choice’

Photo: GT

Photo: GT

Editor’s Note:

April 4, 2024, marks the 75th anniversary of the founding of NATO. As a product of the Cold War, NATO should have been disbanded, but over the years, it has served as a war machine and facilitated US hegemony. The Global Times talked to a number of experts and scholars to reveal how the US exploits NATO to serve its geopolitical purposes and how NATO destabilizes the world, exacerbates nuclear threats and brings confrontation to Asia. 

In the third interview of the series, Global Times (GT) reporter Ma Ruiqian talked to Jeffrey Sachs (Sachs), a world-renowned American economist. He elucidated on how NATO has become the root cause of global turmoil, and the roles played by the US and Europe therein. Furthermore, he expressed his views on how to construct a global security perspective.

GT: Some believe as a by-product of the Cold War, NATO should have disbanded at the end of the Cold War and its existence is a source of global disruption. What do you think?

Sachs: NATO was created in 1949 to defend against a possible invasion of Western Europe by the Soviet Union. The idea was to create a transatlantic military alliance in which the US military power and direction would predominate and coordinate the militaries of Western Europe in defense against the Soviet Union. There were 12 countries in NATO at the start. One purpose was to remilitarize Germany, under US control, so as to prevent another German-led war. The first Secretary-General of NATO, Lord Hastings Lionel Ismay (UK), famously described NATO’s purpose as “to keep the Soviet Union out, the US in, and the Germans down,” in Western Europe. 

In 1988, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev called an end to the Cold War. He declared that security in Europe should be based on a Common European Home. This was a gesture of historic proportion, and could have led to many generations of peace between Europe, the US, and the Soviet Union, including Russia. In 1990, German Chancellor Helmut Kohl called for German reunification, and to assure the Soviet Union that reunification would not threaten the Soviet Union, Germany and the US explicitly promised Gorbachev that NATO would not expand eastward even one inch. In return, Gorbachev ended the Warsaw Pact military alliance. Peace was truly at hand. 

The big mistake, thereafter, is that the US regarded the new peace as a unilateral victory of the US over Russia, not as a victory of peace together with Russia. When the Soviet Union disbanded in December 1991, and with Russia as the successor state of the Soviet Union among 15 new independent nations, the US decided to go back on its word and begin to expand NATO eastward. By now, there are 32 member states in NATO. 

Indeed, American policymakers decided that the US was now the world’s sole superpower in a unipolar world. Thus, an age of extraordinary US arrogance arose in 1992 that has taken us to many unnecessary and costly wars up to now. The US arrogance is still at the base of US foreign policy, even though it is now very clear that we live in a multipolar, not a unipolar, world. 

Specifically, in the 1990s, the US decided that it would keep expanding NATO eastward to partially or entirely surround Russia, and thereby weaken Russia. NATO enlargement up to Ukraine and Georgia aimed to surround Russia’s naval fleet in the Black Sea, weakening Russia’s military power and geopolitical role. This was the same approach as Britain took in the Crimean War in 1853. It is the fundamental cause of the Ukraine War. 

NATO is a military alliance led by the US. Since the US is not a defensive power, but an offensive one, so too is NATO. NATO has taken many offensive actions, such as in Serbia-Kosovo, the NATO occupation of Afghanistan, NATO’s bombing of Libya, and also the NATO arming of Ukraine in the US-Russia proxy war in Ukraine. 

In short, NATO should have been disbanded in 1990, and history would have been very different, far more peaceful, cooperative and productive, and with far fewer wars. NATO should have been replaced by the OSCE, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which includes countries of Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union. With NATO disbanded, and a strengthened UN, we probably would have avoided the disastrous US “wars of choice” since then. 

GT: You recently stated in an interview that US President Joe Biden is pushing NATO against the will of the American people. Could you further elaborate on the contradiction between the will of the American people and NATO’s actions?

Sachs: The American people want peace. This is true even despite the propaganda of fear created by the US government. The public does not want to continue to arm Ukraine, and the public is opposed to Israel’s war in Gaza. In general, America urgently needs economic rebuilding at home, but the military budget keeps rising and the US wars of choice continue. 

GT: You mentioned in a recent interview that French President Macron acknowledged that the Ukraine-Russia conflict was provoked by the NATO enlargement, but in reality, some say the opposite is true, “as if they are playing a game.” Why do you think Europe continues to engage in this high-cost game? Who are the ultimate victims and beneficiaries of this “game”?

Sachs: I don’t understand, truly, the position of France, Germany and Italy with regard to the war in Ukraine. The war is a war caused by NATO enlargement, and the major powers in Western Europe know it. The Ukraine war hurts their security and their economy. In private they opposed NATO enlargement to Ukraine in 2008 at the NATO Bucharest Summit, knowing that an invitation to Ukraine to join NATO would create many deep tensions with Russia and even the possibility of war, just as it has done. Yet the Europeans decided to follow the US policy line. It’s hard to understand why, as the Ukraine war is not popular with the people of Europe. Perhaps the security services of the US (CIA) and of Europe are too strong even vis-à-vis their civilian governments. I can’t fully explain the European position. 

GT: On April 3, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg proposed creating a 100 billion-euro ($107 billion), five-year fund for Ukraine. What is your perspective on it? 

Sachs: This is a very implausible idea, as military generals cannot truly bind the governments of the NATO countries for the next five years. Each government would have to agree. I do not see this happening. I think this is mostly political rhetoric, not reality. What Ukraine really needs is US-Russia security negotiations, including the promise that NATO will not enlarge, adding Ukraine as a member. Then peace can be achieved and Ukraine can be made safe. 

GT: NATO is extending its reach to the Asia-Pacific region. How do you view NATO’s accusations and actions against China?

Sachs: The idea of expanding NATO to Asia is foreign-policy madness in my view, a reflection of the delusional arrogance of the United States security officials. The entire idea is against the NATO Treaty, which is about defense of the North Atlantic region. The US provocations against China, especially regarding Taiwan, could lead to a war like the Ukraine war. Obviously, such a war would be tragic, devastating and threatening to the survival of humanity. Expanding NATO to Asia makes such a war more likely. That’s why I feel that NATO expanding to Asia is delusional. 

GT: In 2022, China proposed the Global Security Initiative. How do you view China’s answer to building a new world security perspective?

Sachs: China’s peaceful global statecraft is based on 2,200 years of experience, in which China never launched a single war against an overseas country, as far as I can recall. China never attacked countries in the Indian Ocean despite its great naval fleets of the 15th century. 

China has never sought to become a global empire, nor has it desired global hegemony. China has always sought harmony in its international relations, in a system of mutual respect. In my view, this tradition of statecraft aligns with the world’s needs today and aligns closely with the UN Charter, which aims to ensure peaceful relations among sovereign countries under the international rule of law. 

Thus, I greatly appreciate China’s call for peace, harmony and strengthening the UN Charter. I also strongly support China’s emphasis on non-intervention in the internal affairs of other nations. When the US intervenes in internal politics, or dozens of “covert regime change operations” around the world, this violates international law, creates disorder and provokes wars, all of which are harmful to the common good worldwide. 

One proposal that I advocate is for all nations to renounce overseas military bases, and to keep their militaries at home. The US reportedly has more than 800 overseas military bases around the world! I would like to see those bases closed and mutual security maintained through the UN Security Council.